Testing in EK9
Tests verify your code works correctly. When you change code later, running tests confirms you haven't broken existing functionality.
- Your First Test
- What Makes EK9 Different
- Test Types - Assert-Based, Black-Box, Parameterized
- The @Test Directive - Grouping tests
- Assertion Statements - assert, assertThrows, assertDoesNotThrow
- Test Runner - Commands and output formats
- Code Coverage - Always-on collection, -tC output
- Output Placeholders - Matching dynamic values
- Compile-Time Validation
- Quick Reference
Your First Test
Create a simple project with two files:
myproject/
├── main.ek9 # Your code (the function to test)
└── dev/
└── tests.ek9 # Your tests
The dev/ directory is special - files here are only included when
running tests. This keeps test code separate from production code.
main.ek9 - The Code to Test
#!ek9
defines module my.first.test
defines function
add() as pure
-> a as Integer, b as Integer
<- result as Integer: a + b
//EOF
dev/tests.ek9 - The Test
#!ek9
defines module my.first.test.tests
references
my.first.test::add
defines program
@Test
AdditionWorks()
result <- add(2, 3)
assert result == 5
//EOF
Key concepts: references imports
symbols from other modules, defines program
declares an entry point, @Test marks it for the
test runner, and assert validates
conditions.
Run it:
$ ek9 -t main.ek9 [i] Found 1 test: 1 assert (unit tests with assertions) Executing 1 test... [OK] PASS my.first.test.tests::AdditionWorks [Assert] (2ms) Summary: 1 passed, 0 failed (1 total)
The file tests.ek9 can be named anything you like, and you can have
as many .ek9 files in dev/ as you need - each can contain
multiple @Test programs. The test runner discovers all of them.
When Tests Fail
EK9 shows exactly what failed:
[X] FAIL my.first.test.tests::AdditionWorks [Assert] (2ms)
Assertion failed: `result==5` at ./dev/tests.ek9:14:7
Summary: 0 passed, 1 failed (1 total)
The expression (result==5), file, line, and column are captured
automatically from the AST. No stack traces to parse, no custom messages to write.
What Makes EK9 Testing Different
Unlike frameworks that require imports and setup, EK9's testing is built into the language grammar. This enables compile-time validation:
- Empty test = compile error - A @Test with no assertions won't compile
- Orphan assertion = compile error - An assert not reachable from any @Test won't compile
- Production assertion = compile error - Using assert in non-test code won't compile
In JUnit or pytest, an empty test passes silently. An orphan assertion is never discovered. EK9 catches these mistakes before you run.
Comparison with Other Languages
| Capability | JUnit / pytest / Go | EK9 |
|---|---|---|
| Empty test detection | Passes silently | Compile error |
| Orphan assertion detection | Never discovered | Compile error |
| Assertion in prod code | Allowed (or runtime only) | Compile error |
| Error location | Parse stack trace | Exact file:line:column |
| Expression capture | Write custom message | Automatic from AST |
| Test imports | Required (JUnit, pytest) | None - grammar-level |
| Output formats | Framework-specific | Human, Terse, JSON, JUnit XML |
| Black-box testing | Separate tools/frameworks | Built-in expected_output.txt |
| Dynamic value matching | Custom matchers | Type-based placeholders |
Tests Run Automatically
When you package (ek9 -P) or deploy (ek9 -D) your code,
tests are executed automatically. You don't need to remember to run them - EK9
won't package code with failing tests. Testing isn't a separate manual step; it's
woven into the development workflow.
Test Types
EK9 supports three complementary testing approaches:
- Assert-Based - Unit testing individual functions; call functions
and check results with
assert - Black-Box - Regression testing program output; compare stdout
to
expected_output.txt - Parameterized - Testing with multiple input sets; run same test with different input files
1. Assert-Based Tests
Use assert, assertThrows, and assertDoesNotThrow
for internal validation within test code.
Project Structure
simpleAssertTest/
├── main.ek9 # Production code (functions to test)
└── dev/
└── tests.ek9 # Test programs with @Test directive
Production Code (main.ek9)
#!ek9
defines module simple.assert.test
defines function
add() as pure
->
a as Integer
b as Integer
<- result as Integer: a + b
multiply() as pure
->
a as Integer
b as Integer
<- result as Integer: a * b
//EOF
Test Code (dev/tests.ek9)
#!ek9
defines module simple.assert.test.tests
references
simple.assert.test::add
simple.assert.test::multiply
defines program
@Test
AdditionTest()
result <- add(2, 3)
assert result?
assert result == 5
@Test
MultiplicationTest()
result <- multiply(4, 5)
assert result?
assert result == 20
@Test
CombinedOperationsTest()
sum <- add(10, 20)
product <- multiply(sum, 2)
assert product == 60
//EOF
2. Black-Box Tests
Validate program output against expected files. For tests without command line
arguments, the file must be named exactly expected_output.txt in
the same directory as the test. Ideal for regression testing and AI-generated tests.
Project Structure
blackBoxTest/
├── main.ek9 # Production code
└── dev/
├── tests.ek9 # Test program
└── expected_output.txt # Expected stdout output
Production Code (main.ek9)
#!ek9
defines module blackbox.test
defines function
greet() as pure
-> name as String
<- greeting as String: "Hello, " + name + "!"
//EOF
Test Code (dev/tests.ek9)
#!ek9
defines module blackbox.test.tests
references
blackbox.test::greet
defines program
@Test
GreetingOutputTest()
stdout <- Stdout()
stdout.println(greet("World"))
stdout.println(greet("EK9"))
//EOF
Expected Output (dev/expected_output.txt)
Hello, World! Hello, EK9!
When Output Doesn't Match
If the actual output differs from expected, EK9 shows a line-by-line comparison:
[X] FAIL blackbox.test.tests::GreetingOutputTest [BlackBox] (3ms)
Output mismatch at line 2:
Expected: Hello, EK9!
Actual: Hello, EK9?
3. Parameterized Tests
Run the same test with multiple inputs using commandline_arg_{id}.txt
and expected_case_{id}.txt file pairs. Each file pair defines a test case.
Project Structure
parameterizedTest/
├── main.ek9 # Production code
└── dev/
├── tests.ek9 # Test program with parameters
├── commandline_arg_simple.txt # Case "simple": input arguments
├── expected_case_simple.txt # Case "simple": expected output
├── commandline_arg_edge.txt # Case "edge": input arguments
└── expected_case_edge.txt # Case "edge": expected output
Production Code (main.ek9)
#!ek9
defines module parameterized.test
defines function
processArg() as pure
-> arg as String
<- result as String: "Processed: " + arg
//EOF
Test Code (dev/tests.ek9)
#!ek9
defines module parameterized.test.tests
references
parameterized.test::processArg
defines program
@Test
ArgProcessor()
->
arg0 as String
arg1 as String
stdout <- Stdout()
stdout.println(processArg(arg0))
stdout.println(processArg(arg1))
//EOF
Test Case "simple"
commandline_arg_simple.txt:
hello world
expected_case_simple.txt:
Processed: hello Processed: world
Test Case "edge"
commandline_arg_edge.txt:
single only
expected_case_edge.txt:
Processed: single Processed: only
The @Test Directive
Mark programs as tests using the @Test directive. Only programs with
this directive are discovered and executed by the test runner.
Ungrouped vs Grouped Tests
By default, tests run in parallel for faster execution. Use groups when tests need sequential execution - typically for database tests, file system tests, or tests that share external resources where order matters.
Syntax: @Test: "groupname" - tests in the same group run sequentially,
while different groups run in parallel with each other.
Project Structure
groupedTests/
├── main.ek9 # Production code (Counter class)
└── dev/
└── tests.ek9 # Test programs
Production Code (main.ek9)
#!ek9
defines module grouped.tests
defines class
Counter
value as Integer: 0
getValue() as pure
<- rtn as Integer: value
increment()
value: value + 1
//EOF
Test Code (dev/tests.ek9)
#!ek9
defines module grouped.tests.tests
references
grouped.tests::Counter
defines program
@Test: "counter"
CounterIncrementTest()
c <- Counter()
c.increment()
assert c.getValue() == 1
@Test: "counter"
CounterMultipleIncrementTest()
c <- Counter()
c.increment()
c.increment()
c.increment()
assert c.getValue() == 3
@Test
IndependentTest()
c <- Counter()
assert c.getValue() == 0
//EOF
CounterIncrementTest and CounterMultipleIncrementTest
are both in the "counter" group and run sequentially. IndependentTest has no
group and runs in parallel with other ungrouped tests.
Assertion Statements
Unlike traditional testing frameworks that require parsing stack traces, EK9's assertions provide structured, precise error information automatically captured from the AST. This includes the exact source location (file, line, column), the expression that failed, and contextual details - all without writing custom error messages.
assert
Validates that a condition is true:
@Test CheckAddition() result <- 2 + 3 assert result? // Check result is set (not unset) assert result == 5 // Check result equals expected value
Failure Output
When an assertion fails, EK9 shows the exact expression and location:
Assertion failed: `result==5` at ./dev/tests.ek9:28:7
assertThrows
Validates that an expression throws a specific exception type:
@Test CheckDivisionByZero() assertThrows(Exception, 10 / 0) @Test CheckAndInspectException() caught <- assertThrows(Exception, 10 / 0) assert caught.message()?
Failure Output - No Exception Thrown
If the expression doesn't throw:
assertThrows FAILED Location: ./dev/tests.ek9:5:3 Expression: 10 / 2 Expected: org.ek9.lang::Exception Actual: No exception was thrown
assertDoesNotThrow
Validates that an expression completes without throwing any exception:
@Test CheckSafeDivision() assertDoesNotThrow(10 / 2) @Test CheckAndCaptureResult() result <- assertDoesNotThrow(10 / 2) assert result == 5
Failure Output
If the expression throws unexpectedly:
assertDoesNotThrow FAILED Location: ./dev/tests.ek9:5:3 Expression: 10 / 0 Expected: No exception Actual: org.ek9.lang::Exception Message: Division by zero
Why This Matters
Traditional testing frameworks like JUnit or pytest require you to either:
- Write custom assertion messages manually
- Parse stack traces to find the failure location
- Guess which assertion failed when there are multiple in a test
EK9's grammar-level assertions automatically capture the expression text, source location, and all relevant context at compile time. This is especially valuable for:
- AI/LLM integration - Structured output is easily parsed
- CI/CD pipelines - Precise locations enable automated issue creation
- Debugging - No stack trace parsing required
require vs assert
EK9 distinguishes between production preconditions and test assertions:
require- Production preconditions, checked in any code pathassert- Test validation, only valid in@Testprograms
Using assert in production code paths produces compile-time error
E81012.
Test Runner
Run tests using the -t flag:
ek9 -t myproject.ek9 # Run tests (human output) ek9 -t0 myproject.ek9 # Terse output ek9 -t2 myproject.ek9 # JSON output (for CI/AI) ek9 -t3 myproject.ek9 # JUnit XML output ek9 -tL myproject.ek9 # List tests without running ek9 -tg database myproject.ek9 # Run only "database" group
Exit codes: The test runner returns exit code 0 when all tests pass,
and exit code 11 when any test fails. This enables CI/CD pipelines to
detect failures automatically. See Command Line for
all exit codes.
Output Formats
EK9 provides four output formats optimized for different use cases:
Human Format (-t or -t1)
Visual output with icons for terminal use:
[i] Found 4 tests:
4 assert (unit tests with assertions)
Executing 4 tests...
[OK] PASS myapp.tests::AdditionWorks [Assert] (3ms)
[X] FAIL myapp.tests::DivisionFails [Assert] (2ms)
Assertion failed: `result==5` at ./dev/tests.ek9:28:7
[X] FAIL myapp.tests::AnotherFailure [Assert] (1ms)
Assertion failed: `1==2` at ./dev/tests.ek9:33:7
[OK] PASS myapp.tests::MultiplicationWorks [Assert] (2ms)
Summary: 2 passed, 2 failed (4 total)
Types: 4 assert
Duration: 8ms
Grouped tests show their group name:
[OK] PASS myapp.tests::CounterTest [Assert] {counter} (2ms)
Terse Format (-t0)
Minimal output for scripting and CI pass/fail checks:
4 tests: 2 passed, 2 failed (4 assert)
JSON Format (-t2)
Structured output for AI/LLM integration and custom tooling:
{
"version": "1.0",
"timestamp": "2025-12-31T14:30:00+00:00",
"architecture": "JVM",
"summary": {
"total": 4,
"passed": 2,
"failed": 2,
"types": { "assert": 4 }
},
"tests": [
{
"name": "AdditionWorks",
"fqn": "myapp.tests::AdditionWorks",
"status": "passed",
"duration_ms": 3
},
{
"name": "DivisionFails",
"fqn": "myapp.tests::DivisionFails",
"status": "failed",
"failure": {
"type": "assertion",
"message": "Assertion failed: `result==5` at ./dev/tests.ek9:28:7"
}
}
]
}
JUnit XML Format (-t3)
Standard format for CI/CD systems (Jenkins, GitHub Actions, GitLab):
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<testsuite name="myapp.tests" tests="4" failures="2" errors="0" time="0.008">
<testcase name="AdditionWorks" classname="myapp.tests" time="0.003"/>
<testcase name="DivisionFails" classname="myapp.tests" time="0.002">
<failure message="Assertion failed" type="AssertionError">
Assertion failed: `result==5` at ./dev/tests.ek9:28:7
</failure>
</testcase>
<testcase name="AnotherFailure" classname="myapp.tests" time="0.001">
<failure message="Assertion failed" type="AssertionError">
Assertion failed: `1==2` at ./dev/tests.ek9:33:7
</failure>
</testcase>
<testcase name="MultiplicationWorks" classname="myapp.tests" time="0.002"/>
</testsuite>
Code Coverage
EK9 automatically collects code coverage data during test execution. Coverage probes are inserted at compile time at all control flow points:
- Function/method entry and exit
- Branch decisions - if/else branches, switch cases
- Loop body execution - for, for-range, while, do-while
- Exception handlers - catch/handle blocks
Coverage is always collected when running tests with -t. Use the
-tC flag to display or output coverage results.
Coverage Output with -tC
The coverage output format follows the test output format:
ek9 -t -tC main.ek9 # Human-readable coverage summary ek9 -t0 -tC main.ek9 # Terse coverage: Coverage: 87.5% (7/8) ek9 -t2 -tC main.ek9 # JSON output to files ek9 -t3 -tC main.ek9 # JUnit XML + JaCoCo XML to files
File Output for Machine Formats
When using machine formats (-t2 or -t3) with -tC,
results are written to files in the .ek9/ directory:
| Flags | Test Results | Coverage Results |
|---|---|---|
-t2 -tC |
.ek9/test-results.json |
.ek9/coverage.json |
-t3 -tC |
.ek9/test-results.xml (JUnit) |
.ek9/coverage.xml (JaCoCo) |
A human-readable summary with file paths is printed to stdout:
Summary: 3 passed, 0 failed (3 total) Types: 3 assert Duration: 13ms Test results written to: .ek9/test-results.json Coverage results written to: .ek9/coverage.json
The JaCoCo XML format (.ek9/coverage.xml) is compatible with coverage tools
like SonarQube, Codecov, and Coveralls.
Coverage JSON Format
{
"coverage": {
"methods": { "percentage": 100.00, "covered": 3, "total": 3 },
"lines": { "percentage": 100.00, "covered": 5, "total": 5 },
"branches": { "percentage": 100.00, "covered": 5, "total": 5 },
"overall": 100.00,
"probesHit": 5,
"probesTotal": 5,
"modules": {
"my.module.tests": { "coverage": 100.00, "hit": 3, "total": 3 },
"my.module": { "coverage": 100.00, "hit": 2, "total": 2 }
}
}
}
JaCoCo XML Format
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE report PUBLIC "-//JACOCO//DTD Report 1.1//EN" "report.dtd">
<report name="EK9 Coverage">
<counter type="METHOD" missed="0" covered="3"/>
<counter type="LINE" missed="0" covered="5"/>
<counter type="BRANCH" missed="0" covered="5"/>
<package name="my/module/tests">
<counter type="BRANCH" missed="0" covered="3"/>
</package>
</report>
Output Placeholders
Black-box tests often produce dynamic values like dates, timestamps, or IDs that change between runs. Use type-based placeholders in expected output files to match these values. Placeholder names match EK9 type names - if you know EK9 types, you know the placeholders.
Example: Testing a Report Generator
main.ek9
#!ek9
defines module report.generator
defines function
generateReport() as pure
-> itemCount as Integer
<- report as String: `Report generated on ` + $Date() + ` with ` + $itemCount + ` items`
//EOF
dev/tests.ek9
#!ek9
defines module report.generator.tests
references
report.generator::generateReport
defines program
@Test
ReportIncludesDate()
stdout <- Stdout()
stdout.println(generateReport(42))
//EOF
dev/expected_output.txt
Report generated on {{Date}} with {{Integer}} items
The test passes regardless of which date or item count is used, because
{{Date}} matches any valid date (e.g., 2025-12-31) and
{{Integer}} matches any integer.
Available Placeholders
| Placeholder | Matches | Example |
|---|---|---|
{{String}} | Any non-empty text | hello world |
{{Integer}} | Whole numbers | 42, -17 |
{{Float}} | Decimal numbers | 3.14, -2.5 |
{{Boolean}} | true or false | true |
{{Date}} | ISO date | 2025-12-31 |
{{Time}} | Time of day | 14:30:45 |
{{DateTime}} | ISO datetime with timezone | 2025-12-31T14:30:45+00:00 |
{{Duration}} | ISO duration | PT1H30M, P1Y2M3D |
{{Millisecond}} | Milliseconds | 5000ms |
{{Money}} | Currency amount | 10.50#USD |
{{Colour}} | Hex colour | #FF5733 |
{{Dimension}} | Measurement with unit | 10.5px, 100mm |
{{GUID}} | UUID format | 550e8400-e29b-41d4-... |
{{FileSystemPath}} | File/directory path | /path/to/file.txt, C:\dir\file |
See E81010 for the complete list of 18 valid placeholders. Using an invalid placeholder name produces a compile-time error.
Compile-Time Validation
EK9's call graph analysis detects testing issues at compile time:
- E81007 - Empty @Test (no assertions, no expected files)
- E81011 - Orphan assertion (not reachable from any @Test)
- E81012 - Production assertion (assert in non-test code path)
Test Directory Structure
Test files live in the dev/ directory, which is only included when
running tests (-t flag).
myproject/
├── main.ek9 # Production code
└── dev/ # Test source directory
├── unitTests.ek9 # Assert-based tests
├── greetingTest/ # Black-box test (one per directory)
│ ├── test.ek9
│ └── expected_output.txt
└── calculatorTest/ # Parameterized test
├── test.ek9
├── commandline_arg_basic.txt
├── expected_case_basic.txt
├── commandline_arg_edge.txt
└── expected_case_edge.txt
Test Configuration Errors
See the Error Index for complete documentation of test configuration errors (E81xxx) and test execution errors (E82xxx).
Quick Reference
| Task | Command / Syntax |
|---|---|
| Run all tests | ek9 -t main.ek9 |
| Run with JSON output | ek9 -t2 main.ek9 |
| Run with JUnit XML | ek9 -t3 main.ek9 |
| List tests only | ek9 -tL main.ek9 |
| Run specific group | ek9 -tg groupname main.ek9 |
| Show coverage summary | ek9 -t -tC main.ek9 |
| JSON + coverage to files | ek9 -t2 -tC main.ek9 |
| XML + coverage to files | ek9 -t3 -tC main.ek9 |
| Mark as test | @Test before program |
| Mark as grouped test | @Test: "groupname" |
| Assert condition | assert condition |
| Assert throws | assertThrows(ExceptionType, expr) |
| Assert no throw | assertDoesNotThrow(expr) |
| Black-box expected file | dev/expected_output.txt |
| Parameterized args | dev/commandline_arg_{id}.txt |
| Parameterized expected | dev/expected_case_{id}.txt |